<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><iframe loading="lazy" src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/button.js?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.inboundmlmsuccess.com%2Fblog%2Findex.php%2F2011%2F07%2F22%2Fgroupon-to-face-new-suit-to-apply-gift-card-laws%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></div>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignleft" src="http://andrewchenblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/groupon-logo.jpeg" alt="" width="360" height="178" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify">Groupon Inc. is dealing with an additional class-action lawsuit associated to regardless of whether its offers need to be subject to state laws regulating gift cards, this time around on behalf of the Riverside resident who bought a Nordstrom Rack voucher in 2010.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">The complaint had been filed in Kane County Circuit Court by St. Charles law firms Foote, Meyers, Mielke &amp; Flowers LLC and Chavez Law Firm. Based on the filing, Adam Dremak of Riverside spent $25 on a Groupon in November 2010 of which gave him $50 off at Nordstrom Rack. The actual promotion expired Dec. 31, 2010, and that he failed to redeem the voucher before then.</p>

<div class="post-teaser-block"><strong>Continue Reading: <a href="https://www.inboundmlmsuccess.com/blog/index.php/2011/07/22/groupon-to-face-new-suit-to-apply-gift-card-laws/" title="Groupon To Face New Suit To Apply Gift-Card Laws" rel="bookmark">Groupon To Face New Suit To Apply Gift-Card Laws</a></strong></div>{"id":1540,"date":"2011-07-22T11:51:08","date_gmt":"2011-07-22T17:51:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/inboundmlmsuccess.com\/blog\/?p=1540"},"modified":"2011-07-22T11:51:08","modified_gmt":"2011-07-22T17:51:08","slug":"groupon-to-face-new-suit-to-apply-gift-card-laws","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.inboundmlmsuccess.com\/blog\/index.php\/2011\/07\/22\/groupon-to-face-new-suit-to-apply-gift-card-laws\/","title":{"rendered":"Groupon To Face New Suit To Apply Gift-Card Laws"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"tweetmeme_button\" style=\"float: right; margin-left: 10px;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/api.tweetmeme.com\/button.js?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.inboundmlmsuccess.com%2Fblog%2Findex.php%2F2011%2F07%2F22%2Fgroupon-to-face-new-suit-to-apply-gift-card-laws%2F&amp;style=normal\" height=\"61\" width=\"50\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/andrewchenblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/groupon-logo.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"360\" height=\"178\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Groupon Inc. is dealing with an additional class-action lawsuit associated to regardless of whether its offers need to be subject to state laws regulating gift cards, this time around on behalf of the Riverside resident who bought a Nordstrom Rack voucher in 2010.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The complaint had been filed in Kane County Circuit Court by St. Charles law firms Foote, Meyers, Mielke &amp; Flowers LLC and Chavez Law Firm. Based on the filing, Adam Dremak of Riverside spent $25 on a Groupon in November 2010 of which gave him $50 off at Nordstrom Rack. The actual promotion expired Dec. 31, 2010, and that he failed to redeem the voucher before then.<\/p>\n\n<div class=\"post-teaser-block\"><strong>Continue Reading: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.inboundmlmsuccess.com\/blog\/index.php\/2011\/07\/22\/groupon-to-face-new-suit-to-apply-gift-card-laws\/\" title=\"Groupon To Face New Suit To Apply Gift-Card Laws\" rel=\"bookmark\">Groupon To Face New Suit To Apply Gift-Card Laws<\/a><\/strong><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":null,"protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1797,1798,1799,1800,1801,1802,1803,1804,1805],"class_list":["post-1540","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-buyer-files-suit-against-groupon-kane-county","tag-groupon-charged-with-lawsuit-kane-county","tag-groupon-consumer-files-charges-against-the-company-kane-county","tag-groupon-consumer-files-lawsuit-kane-county","tag-groupon-coupons-should-be-filed-as-gift-certificates-lawsuit-claims-kane-county","tag-groupon-faces-gift-card-related-lawsuit-kane-county","tag-groupon-faces-lawsuit-gift-card-laws-kane-county","tag-groupon-faces-new-lawsuit-kane-county","tag-purchaser-files-lawsuit-against-groupon-kane-county","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.inboundmlmsuccess.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1540","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.inboundmlmsuccess.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.inboundmlmsuccess.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.inboundmlmsuccess.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.inboundmlmsuccess.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1540"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.inboundmlmsuccess.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1540\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.inboundmlmsuccess.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1540"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.inboundmlmsuccess.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1540"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.inboundmlmsuccess.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1540"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}